The website of Alex Kinch, live from London
Archive for August, 2009
Is your old mobile worth £1000? This one is
Aug 29th
I don’t normally pay much attention to anything the Daily Mail says – if I did to be honest I’d probably be holed up in a panic room surviving on bread and water as every other type of food known to man causes some terrible disease and modern Britain is too dangerous to venture outside. However, something caught my eye earlier.
For ten points, can you guess what this is (apart from a mobile phone that wouldn’t look out of place in Del Boy’s possession in Only Fools & Horses)?

It’s a Motorola DynaTAC 8000X, launched on an unsuspecting American public in 1983 (with the UK version coming a few years later in 1985). And apparently it could be worth up to £1000 – at least that’s what mobile phone collector Ian Reynolds, co-owner of vintagemobilephones.com, reckons.
The article in the Daily Mail goes on to say that Ian, 42, of County Kerry, says that a mint UK-version 8000X in the original box with all the accessories could fetch £3000. But don’t be confused by the similar looking 8500X – favoured by the aforementioned David Jason in Only Fools & Horses – which is sadly only worth £50-£100.
Another Motorola handset – the 3300 GSM, introduced in a fanfare in 1994 and, according to the Daily Mail, the first one with the ability to receive text messages, could get you up to £300 depending on condition. Ian says “You signed up to a server who sent texts as scroll messages that passed over the phone screen. These mobiles can sell for £130 to £300 if still boxed.”
Feeling a bit left out as you’ve only got a drawer full of old Nokia and Sony Ericsson phones from the last few years? Mobile phone recycling companies like Envirofone will give you an average of £40 for a working second-hand mobile – and Boots are now apparently now offering up to 5,000 Advantage Card points for your old handset. And there’s always the trusty standby of your local Computer Exchange (CEX) store. However, if you want to make the world a better place and start on the long road to beat Bill Gates’s philanthropy skills, the Daily Mail suggests donating your old unwanted mobile to a charity shop – and says Oxfam, Guide Dogs For The Blind, Action Aid and Hearing Dogs For Deaf People will happily take it off your hands.
Now if you don’t mind I’m off to find my old Mercury One2One-branded Motorola M400 (the ‘flip without a flip’). It cost me £300 (with a contract!) back in 1994 and, at the time, caused my father to exclaim: ‘What does an 18 year old want with a mobile? Only posers and drug dealers have mobiles – which one are you then, son?’
If my M400 is worth anything, I might need to remind him of the story when I next see him and suggest that, in hindsight, there was a third option: a savvy investor.
GSM encryption can be cracked for $500
Aug 25th
(This article first appeared on Mobile Industry Review)
That was the shocking claim that popped into my inbox this morning. Spend $500 on a bit of radio hardware, plug it into your laptop and you too can play spooks and listen in to someone’s mobile phone call.
Now before you start panicking, let’s clear a few things up. This is a theoretical possibility – it doesn’t mean your calls are unsecure. Yet. However, whereas before it’d take quite a large chunk of processing power and many, many days of solid number crunching, according to a presentation (PDF) at the recent Hacking at Random (HAR) conference there’s already a plan in place.
The author, Karstan Nohl, needs help though. He’s calling for assistance in computing the rainbow tables required to decrypt the A5/1 ciphered data – all you need apparently is access to BitTorrent, and a certain kind of Nvidia video card (one with a CUDA-enabled GPU, apparently). Karstan reckons with 80 CUDA processors at his disposal he’ll have it cracked by Christmas.
Stan Schatt, Vice President and Practice Director, Healthcare and Security at ABI Research reckons GSM eavesdropping will be a real threat within the next 6-12 months. “Hackers have been quick to break into wireless LANs within the US, so there is no reason to think they won’t move to cell phones once they have the tools in place, particularly because so much valuable information is transmitted over cell phones.
“Potentially this news could have as profound an impact on the cell phone industry as the breaking of WEP encryption had on the wireless LAN industry. When people discovered that their wireless LANs were vulnerable, it slowed the sale of equipment until an industry group—the Wi-Fi Alliance –stepped in and came up with interim security standards. If people do nothing, we are likely to start to hear stories of sensitive information being compromised, acquisition information being leaked, personal financial security information being compromised, etc. We could see tales of blackmail and extortion on the rise.”
Meanwhile, over at risk management specialist Henderson Risk, spokesman Stuart Quick says he’s not suprised A5/1 is being cracked. “It remains a Holy Grail amongst the hacking community and is intriguing because of the associated conspiracy theories. It is believed that the cipher has had weaknesses engineered in to it in order to make it easier for the security services to snoop on calls and that mobile communications providers are therefore misleading or incorrectly advertising their product’s level of security.”
So what can you do to make your mobile calls more secure? A while ago I wrote an article on this very subject, citing some useful tips from Simon Bransfield-Garth, CEO of British tech company Cellcrypt. No article about the security of mobile calls would be complete without a word from Simon: “Everybody has known for quite some time that a theoretical hack of GSM existed. This news means that the theoretical risk will become a very real one within the next six months. Governments have taken steps to manage the threat for years and now this is a very worrying prospect for anyone that discusses valuable or confidential information over their mobile phone.”
In research soon to be published by Cellcrypt, they found in a survey of corporate mobile users in the USA that 79% regularly discuss confidential issues over the phone every few days, with 64% making such calls daily.
So is this all doom and gloom? Will the Sun and sister paper The News of the World be going shopping for this kit to make it a hatrick of sensational eavesdropping stories?* Only time will tell.
* Apart from News of the World and their recent stories apparently involving voicemail ‘hacking’, The Sun caused an uproar in the early 90’s by publishing transcripts of taped conversations between the late Diana Princess of Wales and ‘close friend’ (and apparent Lotus dealer) James Gilbey – under the rather amusing title of ‘Squidgygate‘.
SpinVox rattles the money tin, but is it too late?
Aug 3rd
I know what you’re thinking. “Oh no, not another SpinVox-bashing post”. So rather than continue Ewan’s previous run of what some people have accused of being a personal rant when it’s just merely reporting facts with a few points of personal opinion attached, I’m going to do something different here. I’ll state some “facts” from a couple of other publications, and you can make up your own mind whether we – or the world of technology media at a whole – is on a witch hunt.
Financial Mail reported the following yesterday that:
- one of SpinVox’s ‘technology partners’ is about to pull the plug over an outstanding bill of £100,000.
- another supplier last week filed three county court claims against the company for over £200,000 of unpaid bills.
- other suppliers spoken to by the Financial Mail have said they haven’t been paid for months – if at all.
- some have been threatened with legal action by SpinVox if they spoke to the press.
- one of SpinVox’s call centre suppliers is filing a lawsuit in the High Court.
A quick crunch of the numbers involved in the article and it totals around £320,000.
Meanwhile The Guardian is reporting SpinVox have raised an undisclosed amount – rumoured to be at least £5.5m – of emergency funding from existing suppliers.
Financial Mail’s sources? I count three companies – at least – who aren’t SpinVox. The source of The Guardian’s story? SpinVox itself.
So what did SpinVox say when asked to comment by the Financial Mail? “We’re naturally having discussions with our customers and suppliers as we all adapt to the conditions of the credit crunch” said the unnamed person – who added they “could not comment on matters of litigation.”Random Posts
Recent Comments